<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spyware Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickcoster.com/2005/08/spyware-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickcoster.com/2005/08/spyware-rant/</link>
	<description>Future gazing from a quiet corner of cyberspace.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.nickcoster.com/2005/08/spyware-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickcoster.com/?p=95#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t fill in any details for you but your browser probably did. This is just a helpful feature that Internet explorer and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/central.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt; both use. This is not a sign of spyware.
Use an anti-spyware application. I like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/spywareprevent.mspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; one, but I also like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.download.com/3000-2144-10045910.html?part=69274&amp;subj=dlpage&amp;tag=button&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lavasoft Adaware&lt;/a&gt; one too. 

Ironically the people who are likely to be worst effected by a fraudulent attack are non-internet bankers. This is because of the possible reaction time between the actual attack and the discovery of the incident. An internet banker may notice a discrepancy the same days while someone who waits for their statements will not find out for a month (if they check them at all).

So despite my belief that the banks can offer more security, knowledge is still the very best defense and access to internet banking helps provide that knowledge.

--nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t fill in any details for you but your browser probably did. This is just a helpful feature that Internet explorer and <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/central.html" rel="nofollow">Firefox</a> both use. This is not a sign of spyware.<br />
Use an anti-spyware application. I like the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/spywareprevent.mspx" rel="nofollow">Microsoft</a> one, but I also like the <a href="http://www.download.com/3000-2144-10045910.html?part=69274&amp;subj=dlpage&amp;tag=button" rel="nofollow">Lavasoft Adaware</a> one too. </p>
<p>Ironically the people who are likely to be worst effected by a fraudulent attack are non-internet bankers. This is because of the possible reaction time between the actual attack and the discovery of the incident. An internet banker may notice a discrepancy the same days while someone who waits for their statements will not find out for a month (if they check them at all).</p>
<p>So despite my belief that the banks can offer more security, knowledge is still the very best defense and access to internet banking helps provide that knowledge.</p>
<p>&#8211;nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Coster</title>
		<link>http://www.nickcoster.com/2005/08/spyware-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Coster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickcoster.com/?p=95#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Nick,
You filled in my details for me, or was it spyware. That was a bit nifty.

I read you discourse with interest. I find the concept of someone looking in on my computer as repugnant. I am sure this is happening as outgoing data volumes are sometimes large relative to what I am doing. But what to do?

That Westpac clause just confirms that online banking is not for me.

Check â€˜www.flickr.com/photos/tomcâ€™ for some photos. I need some help with flickr.

Love Dad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,<br />
You filled in my details for me, or was it spyware. That was a bit nifty.</p>
<p>I read you discourse with interest. I find the concept of someone looking in on my computer as repugnant. I am sure this is happening as outgoing data volumes are sometimes large relative to what I am doing. But what to do?</p>
<p>That Westpac clause just confirms that online banking is not for me.</p>
<p>Check â€˜www.flickr.com/photos/tomcâ€™ for some photos. I need some help with flickr.</p>
<p>Love Dad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

